Unleashing the Hidden Potential: The EDI Advantage for SLAs and PGs


As a college student, I was part of a professional organization with a simple yet powerful motto: "Do what you say you will do." Now, as a freelancer, this mantra guides my work ethic, reminding me of the importance of meeting deadlines and delivering on promises.
Recently, this tagline resurfaced in my mind as I delved into the world of SLAs and PGs — essential tools that gauge an organization's commitment to its promises.
In the context of health insurance payments, Service Level Agreements and Performance Guarantees tracking are mechanisms used to ensure that the insurance payer (typically an insurance company or a payer organization) meets certain predefined standards and commitments regarding payment processing and other related services.
Let’s take a closer look at these agreements and the differences between them, and how EDI can help maintain these agreements.
Service Level Agreements
SLAs are formal agreements between the insurance payer and healthcare providers (such as hospitals, clinics, or individual practitioners) that outline the level of service the payer will provide. These agreements typically include terms related to payment processing times, accuracy of claims processing, response times to inquiries, and other aspects of the payment and claims adjudication process. For example, an SLA might specify that the insurance payer will process 90% of claims within 15 days of receipt.

Performance Guarantees
Performance Guarantees (PGs) are specific commitments made by the insurance payer regarding the quality and timeliness of their services. These guarantees often come with financial penalties or incentives to ensure compliance. PGs are typically more focused and measurable than SLAs and may include metrics such as claims processing accuracy rates, payment accuracy rates, and adherence to turnaround times for claims processing. For instance, a PG might specify that the insurance payer will achieve a claims processing accuracy rate of 98% or higher, with penalties imposed for falling below this threshold.
To make this concept relatable, I've established SLAs with my kids at home by tapping into what they desire most: screen time. They agree to do their chores — such as dishes, trash, washing the table and counters, tending to the dog, cleaning the bathroom, and laundry — before screen time. The agreement includes screen time awarded in 30-minute increments, because any more than that and they turn into angry little gremlins. That’s the PG component — they agree to 30 minutes and no more, and if they abuse that rule, they lose the screens but still have to do the work.
I could go on, but this isn't a parenting blog! Let’s just say this is a system that encourages responsibility and accountability in our household, just as it does in the world of health insurance.
SLA and PG Tracking
Tracking SLAs and PGs in health insurance payment involves monitoring and analyzing key performance metrics to ensure that the insurance payer is meeting its contractual obligations. This may involve collecting and analyzing data on claim processing times, payment accuracy, denial rates, customer service response times, and other relevant indicators.
By tracking SLAs and PGs, both insurance payers and healthcare providers can identify areas for improvement, address any issues or discrepancies, and maintain a high level of service quality and efficiency in the payment process. Usually this task is completed by multiple associates.
Electronic Data Interchange
Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) plays a crucial role in the realm of SLAs and PGs by facilitating efficient and accurate communication and transaction processing between the different entities involved in healthcare payments.
EDI and Service Level Agreements
- Streamlined Processes: EDI automates and standardizes the exchange of electronic documents, such as claims and eligibility verification, between healthcare stakeholders. This automation reduces manual intervention and speeds up transaction processing, helping insurance payers meet SLAs related to claims processing turnaround times.
- Real-time Data Exchange: EDI enables real-time data exchange between insurance payers and healthcare providers, allowing for quicker decision-making and resolution of payment-related issues. This real-time visibility helps ensure compliance with SLAs regarding response times and resolution of inquiries or disputes.
- Improved Accuracy: By eliminating manual data entry and paper-based processes, EDI helps improve the accuracy of information exchanged between parties. This accuracy contributes to meeting SLAs related to data quality, payment accuracy rates, and compliance with regulatory requirements. Plus, with no more human errors, we can finally stop blaming Steve in accounting for those mysterious decimal point disasters!
- Enhanced Monitoring and Reporting: EDI systems often include monitoring and reporting capabilities that allow insurance payers to track key performance metrics, such as claims processing times and denial rates. These insights enable proactive management of SLAs, identifying areas for improvement and ensuring continuous compliance with contractual obligations.
EDI and Performance Guarantees
- Efficient Claims Adjudication: EDI facilitates automated claims adjudication processes, enabling insurance payers to efficiently review and process claims according to predefined rules and guidelines. This efficiency helps meet PGs related to claims processing accuracy rates and turnaround times.
- Real-time Performance Tracking: EDI enables real-time tracking of key performance metrics, such as claims processing accuracy rates and payment accuracy rates. This real-time visibility allows insurance payers to monitor their performance against PGs and take corrective actions as needed to maintain compliance.
- Financial Incentives: PGs often come with financial incentives or penalties attached to ensure compliance with performance targets. EDI provides the data and insights needed for insurance payers to measure their performance against PGs and assess any associated financial impacts.
- Continuous Improvement: By providing detailed performance data and insights, EDI helps insurance payers identify areas for improvement and optimize their processes to meet or exceed PGs. This continuous improvement cycle ensures ongoing compliance and enhances overall operational efficiency.
EDI Manager
EDI Sumo has an EDI manager that monitors real time transactions — insurance companies do not need to enlist multiple associates for this manual work. The EDI Sumo EDI manager automates 95% of the work. SLAs and PGs are tracked with a quick report instead of using multiple associates.
The EDI Manager helps an insurance payer to “Do what you say you will do.”